Every dissolution of marriage filed in Miami-Dade County must clear two threshold requirements before a judge will consider anything else. First, at least one spouse must have resided in Florida for six months before the petition was filed. Second, the petition must allege, and the court must find, that the marriage is irretrievably broken. The residency rule appears in Fla. Stat. § 61.021. The grounds rule appears in Fla. Stat. § 61.052. Neither is complicated on its face, but both trip up people who file on their own, and a defect in either one can undo a final judgment months later.
Section 61.021 reads, in full: "To obtain a dissolution of marriage, one of the parties to the marriage must reside 6 months in the state before the filing of the petition." Three points follow from that sentence.
Section 61.052(2) is the operative provision here. Most facts in a dissolution case need no corroboration; the parties' own testimony is enough. Residency is the exception. The statute states that residency "may be corroborated by a valid Florida driver license, a Florida voter's registration card, a valid Florida identification card issued under s. 322.051, or the testimony or affidavit of a third party."
In practice, Miami-Dade family judges expect one of these four items at the final hearing or attached to the motion for final judgment in an uncontested case:
The issue date matters. A license issued two months ago proves that you are a Florida resident now; it does not prove that you were one six months before you filed. In that situation you will need a corroborating witness who can testify to the earlier period. Bring the witness or a notarized affidavit. Judges in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit will not enter a final judgment on residency evidence they consider inadequate, and a judgment entered without competent residency proof is vulnerable to being set aside.
Maria moved from outside Florida into an apartment in Coral Gables on January 10. She obtained a Florida driver license on April 2. She filed her petition for dissolution on July 15. Her license was issued only three and a half months before filing, so it does not by itself corroborate the full six months. Her landlord, however, signs an affidavit confirming the January 10 lease start and continuous occupancy. That affidavit satisfies § 61.052(2). Had Maria waited until October 2 to file, the license alone would have been sufficient.
Florida is a no-fault state. Section 61.052(1) permits dissolution on only two grounds: (a) the marriage is irretrievably broken, or (b) one spouse has been adjudged mentally incapacitated under § 744.331 for at least three years before filing. Adultery, abandonment, and cruelty are not grounds. They may bear on alimony or the parenting plan, but they do not need to be proved to end the marriage.
The statute directs that the ground "shall be pleaded generally." You do not recite the history of the marriage in the petition. A single sentence stating that the marriage is irretrievably broken is legally sufficient. At the hearing, the petitioner's testimony that the marriage cannot be saved is ordinarily all the court requires.
Section 61.052(2)(a) and (b) draw a line based on two facts: whether there is a minor child of the marriage, and whether the responding spouse denies in a written answer that the marriage is irretrievably broken.
If there is no minor child and the respondent does not deny the breakdown, subsection (2)(a) requires the court to enter a judgment of dissolution once it finds the marriage irretrievably broken. There is no discretion to delay.
If there is a minor child, or if the respondent files an answer denying that the marriage is broken, subsection (2)(b) gives the judge three options:
The three-month cap is a hard limit. After that period, if the petitioner still testifies the marriage is over, the court will find it irretrievably broken. A spouse who does not want the divorce can delay it, but cannot prevent it. Contested denials of breakdown are rare in Miami-Dade for that reason; most respondents who oppose the divorce direct their energy toward the financial and parenting issues instead.
Section 61.052(3) permits the court, during any continuance, to enter orders for support and alimony, a parenting plan and child support, attorney's fees, and preservation of marital property. If the judge orders a three-month reconciliation period and your spouse controls the household income, you can still obtain temporary alimony under the categories described in Fla. Stat. § 61.08, and you can obtain an order preventing the transfer or dissipation of assets that will later be divided under Fla. Stat. § 61.075.
Sections 61.021 and 61.052 set the threshold, but several companion rules control the timeline of a Miami dissolution:
The errors below appear repeatedly in self-filed Miami-Dade petitions and in cases we are hired to correct.
Section 61.052(4) provides that a judgment of dissolution restores each spouse to the status of single and unmarried. It does not render the marriage void from the beginning; children remain legitimate, and rights that vested during the marriage remain intact. A judgment is a forward-looking change of status, not a declaration that the marriage never existed. Annulment is a separate remedy with separate grounds.
We calculate the exact date on which you satisfy § 61.021, identify which of the four forms of corroboration under § 61.052(2) you already have, and, where the license or voter card is too recent, secure a third-party affidavit before the petition is filed. If your spouse has denied that the marriage is irretrievably broken, we move for temporary alimony, child support, and asset-preservation orders under § 61.052(3) so that a court-ordered continuance does not leave you without income or protection during the wait.
You can contact the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin by phone at 786-522-1411 or by email at [email protected].